TY - JOUR
T1 - The use of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing urologic procedures in an academic hospital Surabaya
T2 - A retrospective study
AU - Asmarawati, Tri Pudy
AU - Djojodimedjo, Tarmono
AU - Andhika, Dimas Panca
AU - Rusli, Musofa
AU - Qibtiyah, Mariyatul
AU - Mahdi, Bagus Aulia
AU - Novendrianto, Dwiki
AU - Martani, Okla Sekar
AU - Paraton, Hari
AU - Wertheim, Heiman
AU - Kuntaman, Kuntaman
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 Asmarawati et al.
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - Introduction: Prophylactic antibiotics in urological procedures are essential to prevent postoperative infections. A different approach in selecting antibiotic prophylaxis according to the type of procedure is needed. Methodology: A retrospective study was carried out at an academic hospital in Surabaya, Indonesia, by collecting medical records of patients who underwent urologic procedures within 2019- 2020, including microbiological data. Result: One hundred seventy-nine urological procedures were assessed. Antibiotic prophylaxis was administered in the clean-contaminated and clean procedures (93.2% and 6.8%, respectively). Ceftriaxone was commonly used (69.3%), single-dose, one day before the surgery. Gram-negative bacteria were widely found in the urinary culture of patients (75.2%). E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa were dominating with low susceptibility to cephalosporins. ESBL-producing bacteria were E. coli (64%) and K. pneumoniae (89%). Conclusions: The 3rd generation cephalosporins (ceftriaxone) are mostly used in urological procedures despite the low susceptibility against this antibiotic in cultured E coli, P. aeruginosa, and K. pneumonia. The aminoglycosides have relatively good activity and have been suggested in several guidelines for urologic procedures, such as prostate and urinary tract stone procedures. It is crucial to consider the incision site, type of procedure, and bacterial profile in the hospital to propose antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines.
AB - Introduction: Prophylactic antibiotics in urological procedures are essential to prevent postoperative infections. A different approach in selecting antibiotic prophylaxis according to the type of procedure is needed. Methodology: A retrospective study was carried out at an academic hospital in Surabaya, Indonesia, by collecting medical records of patients who underwent urologic procedures within 2019- 2020, including microbiological data. Result: One hundred seventy-nine urological procedures were assessed. Antibiotic prophylaxis was administered in the clean-contaminated and clean procedures (93.2% and 6.8%, respectively). Ceftriaxone was commonly used (69.3%), single-dose, one day before the surgery. Gram-negative bacteria were widely found in the urinary culture of patients (75.2%). E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa were dominating with low susceptibility to cephalosporins. ESBL-producing bacteria were E. coli (64%) and K. pneumoniae (89%). Conclusions: The 3rd generation cephalosporins (ceftriaxone) are mostly used in urological procedures despite the low susceptibility against this antibiotic in cultured E coli, P. aeruginosa, and K. pneumonia. The aminoglycosides have relatively good activity and have been suggested in several guidelines for urologic procedures, such as prostate and urinary tract stone procedures. It is crucial to consider the incision site, type of procedure, and bacterial profile in the hospital to propose antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines.
KW - antibiotic prophylaxis
KW - infection
KW - urologic procedure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164039285&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3855/jidc.17180
DO - 10.3855/jidc.17180
M3 - Article
C2 - 37406058
AN - SCOPUS:85164039285
SN - 2036-6590
VL - 17
SP - 874
EP - 880
JO - Journal of Infection in Developing Countries
JF - Journal of Infection in Developing Countries
IS - 6
ER -