TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of 5% povidone-iodine irrigation compared to 0.9% NaCl in the post laparotomic post laparotomic patient network on the number of the surgical site infections in dr. soetomo hospital, Surabaya
AU - Limanago, Albert Yara
AU - Budipramana, Vicky Sumarki
AU - Lesmana, Tomy
AU - Danardono, Edwin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Advanced Scientific Research. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/10/1
Y1 - 2020/10/1
N2 - Background: The incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) in appendectomy laparotomy is around 9-53%, mainly superficial incisional. Surgical wound irrigation is often done using iodine povidone. This study aimed to compare 0.9% NaCl with 5% iodine povidone against the incidence of SSI in post-laparotomy appendectomy appendicitis patients. Methods: Sampling was carried out from January to April 2020 in 30 perforated appendicitis patients aged 18-60 years who did not experience sepsis, divided into 2 groups, then assessed the presence of infection in the surgical site for up to 30 days after surgery. Results: There was no significant difference between irrigation with 0.9% NaCl and iodine povidone 5% in the subcutaneous tissue of surgical wounds to the incidence of surgical site infections in patients with appendicitis perforation postoperative appendectomy laparotomy (p = 0.543). This showed that both 0.9% NaCl and 5% iodine povidone did not increase or decrease the incidence of perforated appendicitis infection. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between irrigation with 0.9% NaCl and 5% iodine povidone to the incidence of infection in the surgical site. Five percent iodine povidone does not reduce or increase the incidence of infection in the surgical site.
AB - Background: The incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) in appendectomy laparotomy is around 9-53%, mainly superficial incisional. Surgical wound irrigation is often done using iodine povidone. This study aimed to compare 0.9% NaCl with 5% iodine povidone against the incidence of SSI in post-laparotomy appendectomy appendicitis patients. Methods: Sampling was carried out from January to April 2020 in 30 perforated appendicitis patients aged 18-60 years who did not experience sepsis, divided into 2 groups, then assessed the presence of infection in the surgical site for up to 30 days after surgery. Results: There was no significant difference between irrigation with 0.9% NaCl and iodine povidone 5% in the subcutaneous tissue of surgical wounds to the incidence of surgical site infections in patients with appendicitis perforation postoperative appendectomy laparotomy (p = 0.543). This showed that both 0.9% NaCl and 5% iodine povidone did not increase or decrease the incidence of perforated appendicitis infection. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between irrigation with 0.9% NaCl and 5% iodine povidone to the incidence of infection in the surgical site. Five percent iodine povidone does not reduce or increase the incidence of infection in the surgical site.
KW - NaCl 0.9%
KW - Perforated appendicitis
KW - Povidone iodine 5%
KW - Surgical site infections
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089684166&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.31838/ijpr/2020.12.04.215
DO - 10.31838/ijpr/2020.12.04.215
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85089684166
SN - 0975-2366
VL - 12
SP - 1525
EP - 1529
JO - International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research
JF - International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research
IS - 4
ER -