The effect of 5% povidone-iodine irrigation compared to 0.9% NaCl in the post laparotomic post laparotomic patient network on the number of the surgical site infections in dr. soetomo hospital, Surabaya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) in appendectomy laparotomy is around 9-53%, mainly superficial incisional. Surgical wound irrigation is often done using iodine povidone. This study aimed to compare 0.9% NaCl with 5% iodine povidone against the incidence of SSI in post-laparotomy appendectomy appendicitis patients. Methods: Sampling was carried out from January to April 2020 in 30 perforated appendicitis patients aged 18-60 years who did not experience sepsis, divided into 2 groups, then assessed the presence of infection in the surgical site for up to 30 days after surgery. Results: There was no significant difference between irrigation with 0.9% NaCl and iodine povidone 5% in the subcutaneous tissue of surgical wounds to the incidence of surgical site infections in patients with appendicitis perforation postoperative appendectomy laparotomy (p = 0.543). This showed that both 0.9% NaCl and 5% iodine povidone did not increase or decrease the incidence of perforated appendicitis infection. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between irrigation with 0.9% NaCl and 5% iodine povidone to the incidence of infection in the surgical site. Five percent iodine povidone does not reduce or increase the incidence of infection in the surgical site.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1525-1529
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Pharmaceutical Research
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2020

Keywords

  • NaCl 0.9%
  • Perforated appendicitis
  • Povidone iodine 5%
  • Surgical site infections

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of 5% povidone-iodine irrigation compared to 0.9% NaCl in the post laparotomic post laparotomic patient network on the number of the surgical site infections in dr. soetomo hospital, Surabaya'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this