TY - JOUR
T1 - Systematic review on cost-effectiveness analysis of school-based oral health promotion program
AU - Rochmah, Thinni Nurul
AU - Ramadhani, Aulia
AU - Bramantoro, Taufan
AU - Permata, Lucindari Gea
AU - Tun, Tin Zar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright: © 2023 Rochmah et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - Objective This study aims to assess the variance of the cost-effectiveness ratio of the school-based oral health promotion and prevention program for elementary school children. Methods This review protocol was registered in the international database of Prospectively Registered Systematic Reviews in Health and Social Care (PROSPERO) (No: CRD 42022326734). The search for articles conducted in March-April 2022 focuses on any kind of school-based Promotive and Preventive Program for elementary school children that have control groups, and the outcome was Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). Grey literatures are not eligible. This review used five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Google Scholar). Two independent reviewers referred to the PICO for inclusion and exclusion criteria and carried out the systematic review process. JBI ACTUARI Guidance for Critical Appraisal of Economic Evaluation Assessment Tools was used to assess the quality of the study. Results Of the total 1,473 articles found, there were 5 articles that matched the article search criteria and were included in a systematic review. It was known that the labor cost has a large proportion of the total program cost, and cost-saving programs were found in the two milk fluoridation programs (18.59 USD and 1.7 USD/averted DMF-S), fluoride mouth rinsing program (10.86 USD), and a comprehensive program with glass ionomer cement (461,766.37 USD/ averted DALYs). Conclusion The fluoride programs and the comprehensive program with glass ionomer cement have the lowest cost-effectiveness ratio.
AB - Objective This study aims to assess the variance of the cost-effectiveness ratio of the school-based oral health promotion and prevention program for elementary school children. Methods This review protocol was registered in the international database of Prospectively Registered Systematic Reviews in Health and Social Care (PROSPERO) (No: CRD 42022326734). The search for articles conducted in March-April 2022 focuses on any kind of school-based Promotive and Preventive Program for elementary school children that have control groups, and the outcome was Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). Grey literatures are not eligible. This review used five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Google Scholar). Two independent reviewers referred to the PICO for inclusion and exclusion criteria and carried out the systematic review process. JBI ACTUARI Guidance for Critical Appraisal of Economic Evaluation Assessment Tools was used to assess the quality of the study. Results Of the total 1,473 articles found, there were 5 articles that matched the article search criteria and were included in a systematic review. It was known that the labor cost has a large proportion of the total program cost, and cost-saving programs were found in the two milk fluoridation programs (18.59 USD and 1.7 USD/averted DMF-S), fluoride mouth rinsing program (10.86 USD), and a comprehensive program with glass ionomer cement (461,766.37 USD/ averted DALYs). Conclusion The fluoride programs and the comprehensive program with glass ionomer cement have the lowest cost-effectiveness ratio.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85153411257&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0284518
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0284518
M3 - Article
C2 - 37079535
AN - SCOPUS:85153411257
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 18
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 4 APRIL
M1 - e0284518
ER -