Selection criteria for patch angioplasty material in carotid endarterectomy

Nur Setiawan Suroto, Fedik Abdul Rantam, Asra Al Fauzi, Prihartini Widiyanti, Agus Turchan, Vega Pangaribuan

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with patch angioplasty has been favored due to its lower reoccurrence of restenosis compared to primary CEA. There are multiple types of patch angioplasty material available. However, selection of patch material is based on uncertain criteria. The aim of this study is to determine the ideal criteria for selecting the best patch material for CEA. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search for studies that describe the ideal criteria for selecting patch material for CEA. We compiled all of the criteria mentioned into one table and selecting the criteria which were most frequently mentioned with a simple scoring system. Results: A total of 65 studies out of 784 studies were assessed for its full-text eligibility. Thus, we found 23 studies that were eligible for analysis. There are 22 ideal criteria that were mentioned in the analyzed studies. We grouped these criteria into physical characteristics, safety, contribution to hemodynamic, contribution in tissue healing, economic aspect, and ability to prevent postsurgical complication. We proposed 10 ideal criteria for guiding vascular surgeon in selecting the best patch angioplasty material. Conclusion: To this day, no material has been discovered which meets all ten criteria. This study’s proposed ideal criteria serve as the foundation for the creation of the best patch angioplasty material.

Original languageEnglish
Article number362
JournalSurgical Neurology International
Volume13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Keywords

  • Carotid endarterectomy
  • Ideal criteria
  • Material
  • Patch angioplasty

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Selection criteria for patch angioplasty material in carotid endarterectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this