TY - JOUR
T1 - RETRACTED
T2 - Efficacy of Intermittent and Continuous Subglottic Secretion Drainage in Preventing the Risk of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials (Medicina, (2023), 59, 2, (283), 10.3390/medicina59020283)
AU - Dewi, Yulis Setiya
AU - Arifin, Hidayat
AU - Pradipta, Rifky Octavia
AU - Qona’ah, Arina
AU - Rosita, Rosita
AU - Giatin, Cindy Nanda
AU - Dawod Kamel Gauda, Amel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the authors.
PY - 2023/11
Y1 - 2023/11
N2 - The journal retracts the article entitled “Efficacy of Intermittent and Continuous Subglottic Secretion Drainage in Preventing the Risk of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials” [1]. Following the publication, concerns were brought to the attention of the Editorial Office regarding a number of irrelevant studies that were included in the analysis of this systematic review and meta-analysis [1]. Adhering to our complaint procedure, an investigation was conducted by the Editorial Office and Editorial Board, which confirmed that a significant number of randomized control trials reviewed were not eligible to be included in the analysis of this systematic review and meta-analysis. Specifically, the inclusion of Chai et al. [2], Chow et al. [3], Philippart et al. [4] and Qiao et al. [5] was considered to have limited relevance to the main topic of this systematic review and meta-analysis, and consequently, was judged to sufficiently compromise the overall findings to a degree that the findings could not be relied upon. Moreover, as a result of this methodological flaw, erroneous analysis and interpretation of the findings was performed. The article is therefore retracted. This retraction was approved by the Editor-in-Chief of the journal Medicina. The authors did not agree to this retraction.
AB - The journal retracts the article entitled “Efficacy of Intermittent and Continuous Subglottic Secretion Drainage in Preventing the Risk of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials” [1]. Following the publication, concerns were brought to the attention of the Editorial Office regarding a number of irrelevant studies that were included in the analysis of this systematic review and meta-analysis [1]. Adhering to our complaint procedure, an investigation was conducted by the Editorial Office and Editorial Board, which confirmed that a significant number of randomized control trials reviewed were not eligible to be included in the analysis of this systematic review and meta-analysis. Specifically, the inclusion of Chai et al. [2], Chow et al. [3], Philippart et al. [4] and Qiao et al. [5] was considered to have limited relevance to the main topic of this systematic review and meta-analysis, and consequently, was judged to sufficiently compromise the overall findings to a degree that the findings could not be relied upon. Moreover, as a result of this methodological flaw, erroneous analysis and interpretation of the findings was performed. The article is therefore retracted. This retraction was approved by the Editor-in-Chief of the journal Medicina. The authors did not agree to this retraction.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177767599&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/medicina59111900
DO - 10.3390/medicina59111900
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 38004097
AN - SCOPUS:85177767599
SN - 1010-660X
VL - 59
JO - Medicina (Lithuania)
JF - Medicina (Lithuania)
IS - 11
M1 - 1900
ER -