TY - JOUR
T1 - Pulmonary edema in preeclampsia
T2 - an Indonesian case–control study
AU - Wardhana, Manggala Pasca
AU - Dachlan, Erry Gumilar
AU - Dekker, Gustaaf
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2018/3/19
Y1 - 2018/3/19
N2 - Objective: To analyze risk factors, obstetric outcome and the need for mechanical ventilation in preeclampsia complicated by pulmonary edema. Materials and methods: Case–control study using medical record on preeclampsia complicated by pulmonary edema patients in East Java tertiary referral hospital over 2 years. A simple scoring system was developed to predict the need for mechanical ventilation, using logistic regression. Results: 1106 cases of preeclampsia were admitted, with 62 cases (5.6%) had pulmonary edema. Postpartum (p <.001) and cesarean delivery (p =.001) proportions were higher in the preeclampsia with pulmonary edema group. Of the 62 cases with pulmonary edema, 81% required intensive care admission and 60% needed mechanical ventilation support. Mechanical ventilation used was associated with eclampsia (p =.04), hypertensive crisis (p =.02), lower serum albumin (p =.05) and higher creatinine (p =.01). A simple scoring model developed could predict a 46%–99% probability of need for mechanical ventilation (AUC (ROC): 0.856, 95%CI 0.763–0.95). Conclusions: Pulmonary edema is a common complication of preeclampsia in Indonesian referral hospitals. This severe complication increased maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. The developed scoring model in this study can be used as a triage tool to predict the probability of mechanical ventilation use due to this complication.
AB - Objective: To analyze risk factors, obstetric outcome and the need for mechanical ventilation in preeclampsia complicated by pulmonary edema. Materials and methods: Case–control study using medical record on preeclampsia complicated by pulmonary edema patients in East Java tertiary referral hospital over 2 years. A simple scoring system was developed to predict the need for mechanical ventilation, using logistic regression. Results: 1106 cases of preeclampsia were admitted, with 62 cases (5.6%) had pulmonary edema. Postpartum (p <.001) and cesarean delivery (p =.001) proportions were higher in the preeclampsia with pulmonary edema group. Of the 62 cases with pulmonary edema, 81% required intensive care admission and 60% needed mechanical ventilation support. Mechanical ventilation used was associated with eclampsia (p =.04), hypertensive crisis (p =.02), lower serum albumin (p =.05) and higher creatinine (p =.01). A simple scoring model developed could predict a 46%–99% probability of need for mechanical ventilation (AUC (ROC): 0.856, 95%CI 0.763–0.95). Conclusions: Pulmonary edema is a common complication of preeclampsia in Indonesian referral hospitals. This severe complication increased maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. The developed scoring model in this study can be used as a triage tool to predict the probability of mechanical ventilation use due to this complication.
KW - Preeclampsia
KW - mechanical ventilation
KW - pulmonary edema
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014452075&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14767058.2017.1295442
DO - 10.1080/14767058.2017.1295442
M3 - Article
C2 - 28282767
AN - SCOPUS:85014452075
SN - 1476-7058
VL - 31
SP - 689
EP - 695
JO - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
JF - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
IS - 6
ER -