TY - GEN
T1 - Optimization of Phantom CT-Scan Image Quality Using Helical and Axial Methods with Variations of mAs and kV
AU - Syah, Zainal Rahmad
AU - Sinta, Erni Dwi
AU - Suhariningsih,
AU - Hariyani, Dita Aprilia
AU - Dyah Permatasari, P. A.
AU - Astuti, Suryani Dyah
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Institute of Physics Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/5/19
Y1 - 2023/5/19
N2 - Research has been carried out on the evaluation of the helical method and the axial method with variations of mAs (140, 200, and 260) and kV (80 and 120) on phantom CT-Scan on image quality. The study was conducted using a phantom as a patient substitute because this study requires repeated scanning. This study aims to determine the effect of the acquisition method, mAs, and kV on the image results on the head phantom. Compares image quality based on Noise. Each image result is performed with the region of interest (ROI) value at 5 points on each slice to get the standard deviation value as a representation of the noise value. Noise value. The data are combined into a graph and a descriptionis made and then compared with the results of the one-way ANOVA test, significant p = 0.00 for the overall noise value data. helical and axial noise methods. The results of the SPSS show that there is a significant difference in the effect of the scanning method. This means that there are differences in the scanning method for the noise value. image results. noise value. shows that the helical scanning method is more optimal to produce optimal images.
AB - Research has been carried out on the evaluation of the helical method and the axial method with variations of mAs (140, 200, and 260) and kV (80 and 120) on phantom CT-Scan on image quality. The study was conducted using a phantom as a patient substitute because this study requires repeated scanning. This study aims to determine the effect of the acquisition method, mAs, and kV on the image results on the head phantom. Compares image quality based on Noise. Each image result is performed with the region of interest (ROI) value at 5 points on each slice to get the standard deviation value as a representation of the noise value. Noise value. The data are combined into a graph and a descriptionis made and then compared with the results of the one-way ANOVA test, significant p = 0.00 for the overall noise value data. helical and axial noise methods. The results of the SPSS show that there is a significant difference in the effect of the scanning method. This means that there are differences in the scanning method for the noise value. image results. noise value. shows that the helical scanning method is more optimal to produce optimal images.
KW - CT-Scan
KW - Scanning method
KW - noise
KW - phantom
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85161443987&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1063/5.0118954
DO - 10.1063/5.0118954
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85161443987
T3 - AIP Conference Proceedings
BT - Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Technology and Multidiscipline, ICATAM 2021
A2 - Widiyanti, Prihartini
A2 - Jiwanti, Prastika Krisma
A2 - Prihandana, Gunawan Setia
A2 - Ningrum, Ratih Ardiati
A2 - Prastio, Rizki Putra
A2 - Setiadi, Herlambang
A2 - Rizki, Intan Nurul
PB - American Institute of Physics Inc.
T2 - 1st International Conference on Advanced Technology and Multidiscipline: Advanced Technology and Multidisciplinary Prospective Towards Bright Future, ICATAM 2021
Y2 - 13 October 2021 through 14 October 2021
ER -