TY - JOUR
T1 - Mercury recovery by Polymer-Enhanced Ultrafiltration
T2 - Comparison of chitosan and poly(ethylenimine) used as macroligand
AU - Kuncoro, Eko Prasetyo
AU - Roussy, Jean
AU - Guibal, Eric
N1 - Funding Information:
E.P. Kuncoro gratefully acknowledges the French Ministry of Education and Research and Ministry of International Affairs for the granting of a Ph.D. fellowship.
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - Chitosan is an aminopolysaccharide that has been widely studied for metal ion recovery. In most cases it is used as a sorbent in solid form, but the polymer can also be used in a dissolved form in the so-called Polymer-Enhanced UltraFiltration (PEUF) process. The present work focuses on the use of dissolved chitosan for the removal of mercury from dilute solutions using an Amicon ultrafiltration unit. Recovery performance is compared to that obtained with poly(ethylenimine) (PEI), a synthetic amine-bearing polymer. The pH, metal concentration, and polymer concentration are the principal parameters to be taken into account in evaluating the recovery process. The impact of these parameters was tested with respect to metal and polymer retention and the filtration flow rate. In the case of chitosan, the comparison of molar metal/amine group ratios at saturation of the polymer in its solid state (adsorption process) and dissolved state (PEUF process) shows that dissolving the polymer improves the accessibility of sorption sites and enhances the sorption capacity. Although the addition of chloride strongly decreased mercury retention, it hardly influenced PEUF performances when using PEI; this indicates a different binding mechanism or, at least, different contributions on the part of electrostatic attraction and chelating mechanisms at different pHs for these different polymers: linear polymer (chitosan) and branched polymer (PEI).
AB - Chitosan is an aminopolysaccharide that has been widely studied for metal ion recovery. In most cases it is used as a sorbent in solid form, but the polymer can also be used in a dissolved form in the so-called Polymer-Enhanced UltraFiltration (PEUF) process. The present work focuses on the use of dissolved chitosan for the removal of mercury from dilute solutions using an Amicon ultrafiltration unit. Recovery performance is compared to that obtained with poly(ethylenimine) (PEI), a synthetic amine-bearing polymer. The pH, metal concentration, and polymer concentration are the principal parameters to be taken into account in evaluating the recovery process. The impact of these parameters was tested with respect to metal and polymer retention and the filtration flow rate. In the case of chitosan, the comparison of molar metal/amine group ratios at saturation of the polymer in its solid state (adsorption process) and dissolved state (PEUF process) shows that dissolving the polymer improves the accessibility of sorption sites and enhances the sorption capacity. Although the addition of chloride strongly decreased mercury retention, it hardly influenced PEUF performances when using PEI; this indicates a different binding mechanism or, at least, different contributions on the part of electrostatic attraction and chelating mechanisms at different pHs for these different polymers: linear polymer (chitosan) and branched polymer (PEI).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13644259057&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1081/SS-200042646
DO - 10.1081/SS-200042646
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:13644259057
SN - 0149-6395
VL - 40
SP - 659
EP - 684
JO - Separation Science and Technology
JF - Separation Science and Technology
IS - 1-3
ER -