TY - JOUR
T1 - Human Rights Violations and Corporate Criminal Liability
T2 - An Analysis of the New Indonesian Criminal Law
AU - Amiati, Mia
AU - Adhryansah,
AU - Prihandono, Iman
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Sriwijaya University. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - In light of the increasing role of corporations in facilitating gross human rights violations, this article seeks to evaluate the implementation of the Indonesian Criminal Law in addressing corporate criminal liability. Notably, the recently amended Indonesian Criminal Law recognizes corporations as subjects of criminal law, but Law No. 26 of 2000, which regulates gross human rights violations, does not. Consequently, this research specifically scrutinizes the Indonesian Criminal Code, Law No. 26 of 2000, and international legal standards to answer the issues: rules of aiding and abetting under international criminal law and the applicability of corporate culture theory, and the implementation of Indonesian Criminal Law in addressing corporate criminal liability for gross human rights violations. Examining these issues relies on three methodologies, namely the statutory approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The results of this article uncover that the recognition of corporations as subjects under the new Indonesian Criminal Code and rectification of the ratione materiae of Law No. 26 of 2000 open the avenue for corporations to be held criminally liable for gross human rights violations based on aiding and abetting. Furthermore, the theory of corporate culture envisaged in the new Indonesian Criminal Code renders the plausibility of holding corporations liable if they are deemed to cultivate a culture that pushes or encourages a gross human rights violation.
AB - In light of the increasing role of corporations in facilitating gross human rights violations, this article seeks to evaluate the implementation of the Indonesian Criminal Law in addressing corporate criminal liability. Notably, the recently amended Indonesian Criminal Law recognizes corporations as subjects of criminal law, but Law No. 26 of 2000, which regulates gross human rights violations, does not. Consequently, this research specifically scrutinizes the Indonesian Criminal Code, Law No. 26 of 2000, and international legal standards to answer the issues: rules of aiding and abetting under international criminal law and the applicability of corporate culture theory, and the implementation of Indonesian Criminal Law in addressing corporate criminal liability for gross human rights violations. Examining these issues relies on three methodologies, namely the statutory approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The results of this article uncover that the recognition of corporations as subjects under the new Indonesian Criminal Code and rectification of the ratione materiae of Law No. 26 of 2000 open the avenue for corporations to be held criminally liable for gross human rights violations based on aiding and abetting. Furthermore, the theory of corporate culture envisaged in the new Indonesian Criminal Code renders the plausibility of holding corporations liable if they are deemed to cultivate a culture that pushes or encourages a gross human rights violation.
KW - Corporate Complicity
KW - Corporate Criminal Liability
KW - Gross Human Rights Violations
KW - International Criminal Law
KW - International Human Rights
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85200639153&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.28946/slrev.Vol8.Iss2.3687.pp230-248
DO - 10.28946/slrev.Vol8.Iss2.3687.pp230-248
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85200639153
SN - 2541-5298
VL - 8
SP - 230
EP - 248
JO - Sriwijaya Law Review
JF - Sriwijaya Law Review
IS - 2
ER -