Electrocardiography on admission is associated with poor outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Electrocardiogram (ECG) is a widely accessible diagnostic tool that can easily be obtained on admission and can reduce excessive contact with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the latest evidence on the association of ECG on admission and the poor outcomes in COVID-19. Methods: A literature search was conducted on online databases for observational studies evaluating ECG parameters and composite poor outcomes comprising ICU admission, severe illness, and mortality in COVID-19 patients. Results: A total of 2,539 patients from seven studies were included in this analysis. Pooled analysis showed that a longer corrected QT (QTc) interval and more frequent prolonged QTc interval were associated with composite poor outcome ([WMD 6.04 [2.62-9.45], P =.001; I²:0%] and [RR 1.89 [1.52-2.36], P <.001; I²:17%], respectively). Patients with poor outcome had a longer QRS duration and a faster heart rate compared with patients with good outcome ([WMD 2.03 [0.20-3.87], P =.030; I²:46.1%] and [WMD 5.96 [0.96-10.95], P =.019; I²:55.9%], respectively). The incidence of left bundle branch block (LBBB), premature atrial contraction (PAC), and premature ventricular contraction (PVC) were higher in patients with poor outcome ([RR 2.55 [1.19-5.47], P =.016; I²:65.9%]; [RR 1.94 [1.32-2.86], P =.001; I²:62.8%]; and [RR 1.84 [1.075-3.17], P =.026; I²:70.6%], respectively). T-wave inversion and ST-depression were more frequent in patients with poor outcome ([RR 1.68 [1.31-2.15], P <.001; I²:14.3%] and [RR 1.61 [1.31-2.00], P <.001; I²:49.5%], respectively). Conclusion: Most ECG abnormalities on admission are significantly associated with an increased composite poor outcome in patients with COVID-19.