TY - JOUR
T1 - Domain-based ambidexterity for managing a dual business model in the hospitality industry in the midst of COVID-19 pandemic
T2 - an exploratory study
AU - Yassiva, Vergine Virsta
AU - Priyono, Anjar
AU - Wibowo, Wisnu Pambudi
N1 - Funding Information:
This research is supported by the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education, Republic of Indonesia under Research for Postgraduate Program Scheme.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited.
PY - 2023/2/28
Y1 - 2023/2/28
N2 - Purpose: This study aims to analyse how a hotel company manages ambidexterity when operating different business models in different markets located in the same country. Design/methodology/approach: This research was conducted using a qualitative case study, and the subjects were selected using the theoretical sampling technique. A corporation managing two hotel business units located in the same city but operating different business models – a premium and a low-cost business model – were selected as subjects. Findings: The empirical evidence revealed that an ambidextrous business model can be realized through integration or separation of appropriate domains of business activities. The empirical findings further showed that exploitations are easier to integrate than explorations. Practical implications: The authors found that firms using structural separation for managing premium and low-cost business models can avoid market cannibalism and achieve synergies between different business models if business model ambidexterity is well managed. Originality/value: This study extends research in the area of ambidexterity and business models. It responds to calls to examine how firms using structural separation implement business model ambidexterity in practice, particularly in service sectors. By analysing the details of activities within the business model, the authors advance the understanding of which domains are suitable for an integration or separation approach.
AB - Purpose: This study aims to analyse how a hotel company manages ambidexterity when operating different business models in different markets located in the same country. Design/methodology/approach: This research was conducted using a qualitative case study, and the subjects were selected using the theoretical sampling technique. A corporation managing two hotel business units located in the same city but operating different business models – a premium and a low-cost business model – were selected as subjects. Findings: The empirical evidence revealed that an ambidextrous business model can be realized through integration or separation of appropriate domains of business activities. The empirical findings further showed that exploitations are easier to integrate than explorations. Practical implications: The authors found that firms using structural separation for managing premium and low-cost business models can avoid market cannibalism and achieve synergies between different business models if business model ambidexterity is well managed. Originality/value: This study extends research in the area of ambidexterity and business models. It responds to calls to examine how firms using structural separation implement business model ambidexterity in practice, particularly in service sectors. By analysing the details of activities within the business model, the authors advance the understanding of which domains are suitable for an integration or separation approach.
KW - Ambidexterity
KW - Business model
KW - Dynamic capability
KW - Innovation
KW - Organizational agility
KW - Resource orchestration
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128606550&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/JABS-05-2021-0192
DO - 10.1108/JABS-05-2021-0192
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85128606550
SN - 1558-7894
VL - 17
SP - 327
EP - 346
JO - Journal of Asia Business Studies
JF - Journal of Asia Business Studies
IS - 2
ER -