TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnostic accuracy of contrast and non-contrast 1.5 tesla magnetic resonance imaging for lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus based on surgical findings
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies
AU - Harmawan, Endra Wibisono
AU - Apriawan, Tedy
AU - Subagio, Eko Agus
AU - Faris, Muhammad
AU - Utomo, Sri Andreani
AU - Utomo, Budi
AU - Bajamal, Abdul Hafid
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 International Journal of Health Sciences. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - This study aims to provide the latest information regarding the accuracy of contrast and non-contrast 1.5 Tesla MRI in the diagnosis of lumbar Herniated Nucleus Pulposus (HNP) compared with surgical findings. We included studies with subjects diagnosed with lumbar HNP due to degenerative processes, preoperative 1.5 Tesla contrast, and non-contrast MRI and described the number of findings of MRI diagnostic tests (index test) on the actual conditions found during surgery (reference standard). We searched literature from 5 databases: ProQuest, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Biomed Central, and ScienceDirect. The sensitivity and specificity of contrast and non-contrast 1.5 Tesla MRI ranged between 64-95% and 55-100% (95% CI) with the area under the curve above the threshold on the ROC curve. Two studies compared the accuracy of MRI and Computed Tomography (CT) myelography with a wider ROC curve on CT myelography than on MRI. The ROC curve which has a wide area under the curve above the threshold depicts the relationship between sensitivity and specificity, shows that contrast non-contrast 1.5 Tesla MRI has a good accuracy in HNP diagnostic.
AB - This study aims to provide the latest information regarding the accuracy of contrast and non-contrast 1.5 Tesla MRI in the diagnosis of lumbar Herniated Nucleus Pulposus (HNP) compared with surgical findings. We included studies with subjects diagnosed with lumbar HNP due to degenerative processes, preoperative 1.5 Tesla contrast, and non-contrast MRI and described the number of findings of MRI diagnostic tests (index test) on the actual conditions found during surgery (reference standard). We searched literature from 5 databases: ProQuest, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Biomed Central, and ScienceDirect. The sensitivity and specificity of contrast and non-contrast 1.5 Tesla MRI ranged between 64-95% and 55-100% (95% CI) with the area under the curve above the threshold on the ROC curve. Two studies compared the accuracy of MRI and Computed Tomography (CT) myelography with a wider ROC curve on CT myelography than on MRI. The ROC curve which has a wide area under the curve above the threshold depicts the relationship between sensitivity and specificity, shows that contrast non-contrast 1.5 Tesla MRI has a good accuracy in HNP diagnostic.
KW - diagnostic test accuracy
KW - herniated nucleus pulposus
KW - MRI
KW - surgical findings
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135384960&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.53730/ijhs.v6nS6.10200
DO - 10.53730/ijhs.v6nS6.10200
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85135384960
SN - 2550-6978
VL - 6
SP - 692
EP - 711
JO - International Journal of Health Sciences
JF - International Journal of Health Sciences
ER -