TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of Meat Content and Foreign Object Detection in Cattle Meatballs Using Ultrasonography, Radiography, and Electrical Impedance Tomography Imaging
AU - Ulum, Mokhamad Fakhrul
AU - Maryani,
AU - Rahminiwati, Min
AU - Choridah, Lina
AU - Setyawan, Nurhuda Hendra
AU - Ain, Khusnul
AU - Mukhaiyar, Utriweni
AU - Pamungkas, Fitra Aji
AU - Jakaria,
AU - Garnadi, Agah Drajat
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Mokhamad Fakhrul Ulum et al.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Meat content and physically hazardous contaminants in the internal section of meatballs cannot be detected by the naked eye or surface detectors. This study is aimed at analyzing the meat content of cattle meatballs and detecting foreign objects using ultrasonography (USG), digital radiography (DR), and electrical impedance tomography (EIT). Meatballs were produced using four different meat formulations (0%, 25%, 50%, and 75% meat) and three treatments (no preservative (control), borax, and formalin preservatives). Cast iron and plastic beads were used as models of foreign objects embedded in the samples. The echogenicity, opacity, and resistivity values of each sample were evaluated and compared across groups. The results showed that the shelf life of the control meatballs was shorter than that of meatballs with preservatives. The echogenicity and opacity values for the different meat formulations were hypoechoic in USG and grey in DR. USG was able to distinguish between control and preservative-treated meatballs but could not differentiate meat content and detect foreign objects. Conversely, DR effectively assessed meat content and detected iron-based foreign objects, while EIT showed higher resistivity values for iron and plastic beads compared to the meatball bodies.
AB - Meat content and physically hazardous contaminants in the internal section of meatballs cannot be detected by the naked eye or surface detectors. This study is aimed at analyzing the meat content of cattle meatballs and detecting foreign objects using ultrasonography (USG), digital radiography (DR), and electrical impedance tomography (EIT). Meatballs were produced using four different meat formulations (0%, 25%, 50%, and 75% meat) and three treatments (no preservative (control), borax, and formalin preservatives). Cast iron and plastic beads were used as models of foreign objects embedded in the samples. The echogenicity, opacity, and resistivity values of each sample were evaluated and compared across groups. The results showed that the shelf life of the control meatballs was shorter than that of meatballs with preservatives. The echogenicity and opacity values for the different meat formulations were hypoechoic in USG and grey in DR. USG was able to distinguish between control and preservative-treated meatballs but could not differentiate meat content and detect foreign objects. Conversely, DR effectively assessed meat content and detected iron-based foreign objects, while EIT showed higher resistivity values for iron and plastic beads compared to the meatball bodies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85201325455&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1155/2024/9526283
DO - 10.1155/2024/9526283
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85201325455
SN - 2356-7015
VL - 2024
JO - International Journal of Food Science
JF - International Journal of Food Science
M1 - 9526283
ER -