TY - JOUR
T1 - Application of Artificial Intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education
T2 - randomized controlled trial
AU - Nazari, Nabi
AU - Shabbir, Muhammad Salman
AU - Setiawan, Roy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
PY - 2021/5
Y1 - 2021/5
N2 - A major challenge in educational technology integration is to engage students with different affective characteristics. Also, how technology shapes attitude and learning behavior is still lacking. Findings from educational psychology and learning sciences have gained less traction in research. The present study was conducted to examine the efficacy of a group format of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) powered writing tool for English second postgraduate students in the English academic writing context. In the present study, (N = 120) students were randomly allocated to either the equipped AI (n = 60) or non-equipped AI (NEAI). The results of the parametric test of analyzing of covariance revealed that at post-intervention, students who participated in the AI intervention group demonstrated statistically significant improvement in the scores, of the behavioral engagement (Cohen's d =.75, 95% CI [0.38, 1.12]), of the emotional engagement Cohen's d =.82, 95% CI [0.45, 1.25], of the cognitive engagement, Cohen's d =.39,95% CI [0.04,.76], of the self-efficacy for writing, Cohen's d =.54, 95% CI [0.18, 0.91], of the positive emotions Cohen's d =. 44, 95% CI [0.08, 0.80], and of the negative emotions, Cohen's d = −.98, 95% CI [−1.36, −0.60], compared with NEAI. The results suggest that AI-powered writing tools could be an efficient tool to promote learning behavior and attitudinal technology acceptance through formative feedback and assessment for non-native postgraduate students in English academic writing.
AB - A major challenge in educational technology integration is to engage students with different affective characteristics. Also, how technology shapes attitude and learning behavior is still lacking. Findings from educational psychology and learning sciences have gained less traction in research. The present study was conducted to examine the efficacy of a group format of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) powered writing tool for English second postgraduate students in the English academic writing context. In the present study, (N = 120) students were randomly allocated to either the equipped AI (n = 60) or non-equipped AI (NEAI). The results of the parametric test of analyzing of covariance revealed that at post-intervention, students who participated in the AI intervention group demonstrated statistically significant improvement in the scores, of the behavioral engagement (Cohen's d =.75, 95% CI [0.38, 1.12]), of the emotional engagement Cohen's d =.82, 95% CI [0.45, 1.25], of the cognitive engagement, Cohen's d =.39,95% CI [0.04,.76], of the self-efficacy for writing, Cohen's d =.54, 95% CI [0.18, 0.91], of the positive emotions Cohen's d =. 44, 95% CI [0.08, 0.80], and of the negative emotions, Cohen's d = −.98, 95% CI [−1.36, −0.60], compared with NEAI. The results suggest that AI-powered writing tools could be an efficient tool to promote learning behavior and attitudinal technology acceptance through formative feedback and assessment for non-native postgraduate students in English academic writing.
KW - Artificial Intelligence
KW - Automated writing evaluation
KW - ESL
KW - Feedback
KW - Formative assessment
KW - L2 writing
KW - Pedagogy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105750282&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014
DO - 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85105750282
SN - 2405-8440
VL - 7
JO - Heliyon
JF - Heliyon
IS - 5
M1 - e07014
ER -